Hello,
El jue, 9 ene 2025 a las 17:25, Paul Sopka escribió:
>
> I figured that other people might also have some interest in this,
> so I am posting the question here.
May I ask if there is a purpose to this other than doing it as a
learning experience (if so, then by all means carry on)? Do you see a
problem with just using current s6-linux-init?
> Now I was wondering why you, Laurent recommend against using the finish
> script of s6-svscan
> for the shutdown procedure (here:
> https://skarnet.org/software/s6/s6-svscan-1.html#stage3).
>
> Using that would make good portion of my implementation more elegant and
> simple, [...]
Perhaps you already know, but if you are interested in comparing, one
can still download s6-linux-init-0.4.0.1 from the skarnet.org website
for studying, which is the last version that used an execline stage1
init, performed the shutdown procedure in .s6-svscan/finish and
shipped small C programs that probably did the same thing that
linux-powertool does here, before the change in package design —which
also surprised me a the time—. Although s6 dropped in version 2.10.0.0
the functionality that allowed those to work, and you'd need
skalibs-2.8.0.1 to be able to actually build and run that version of
s6-linux-init-maker and s6-{halt,poweroff,reboot}.
G.
Received on Sat Jan 11 2025 - 14:22:21 CET