> process #1 should not rely on conditions that it has not previously
> ascertained to be true (eg by setting something up by itself, so it
> exists and is safe to use/rely on it).
> sounds self-evident ? sadly many inits do not comply with that
> postulation, a well known example that comes immediatly to mind
> is the poorly designed/though out SysV init itself.
it also relies on syslog for logging, though it cannot ensure someone
listens to /dev/log and processes the log messages.
Received on Thu May 16 2019 - 15:52:49 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Sun May 09 2021 - 19:44:19 UTC