>Which reminds me, are there any plans to add SIGWINCH to the set of
>signals that 's6-svscan -s' can divert?
Maybe, if it's needed. SIGWINCH is not POSIX, and I'd rather not have
s6 exhibit different behaviours on systems where it's not supported
(same reason why I'm reluctant to add pid namespace support to
s6-supervise). If there's a way to make it entirely transparent, why
not.
--
Laurent
Received on Sun Oct 29 2017 - 21:01:24 UTC