Your assertion sounds scary and foreboding in theory, but is not an
issue in practice.
Certainly not an issue with the example runscript provided.
Wayne
http://b0llix.net/perp/
On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 11:11:06 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <charlieb-supervision_at_budge.apana.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2015, Wayne Marshall wrote:
>
> > The better paradigm for dependency checking is this: for a service
> > with any unmet dependency, fail immediately.
>
> That's great in theory, but can be very expensive in CPU and other
> resources in practice. The dependency check code needs to be very
> lightweight.
>
Received on Fri Jan 16 2015 - 16:21:12 UTC