Re: Virtual hosting with s6-networking

From: Songbo Wang <>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2022 18:03:51 +0200

Hi Colin, thanks for your reply.

On 9/23/22 17:41, Colin Booth wrote:
> a super light
> weight http proxy

Yes, that seems the ideal solution, which may not even exist.

The multiple IP solution is less ideal for me, because n interfaces = n
tcpserver4ds. I would no longer be able to bind to and call it a
day. I guess one can get around this by a firewall redirecting the
traffic, but that adds another layer of complexity... It would be nice
if s6-tcpserver supports binding to multiples addresses.

(BTW, it seems that apart from the special, we cannot bind to
multiple addresses by a single syscall?)
Songbo Wang (汪嵩博)
Received on Sat Sep 24 2022 - 18:03:51 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sat Sep 24 2022 - 18:04:31 CEST