Re: execline "importas" documentation question

From: Colin Booth <colin_at_heliocat.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 04:32:50 +0000

On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 08:35:57PM -0500, Brett Neumeier wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 5:49 PM Colin Booth <colin_at_heliocat.net> wrote:
>
> > I think I know what is going on. I assume you're running this on the
> > commandline? If so, the shell is splitting prefix${FOO}postfix into
> > three words ("prefix", "$FOO", "postfix"), then importas is deleting the
> > middle one. If you write this as a full execline script like so:
> > $ execlineb -c 'importas FOO FOO echo prefix${FOO}postfix'
> > you'll see the full word deletion in action.
> >
>
> Ha, it was definitely a brain cloud, but it wasn't that. bash was, of
> course, replacing ${FOO} with an empty string before running the importas
> command.
>
> The expected behavior does indeed show up if you single-quote that word so
> that bash leaves it alone:
>
> $ importas FOO FOO echo 'prefix${FOO}postfix'
>
> $
>
Glad that worked for you. Generally speaking when I'm doing oneliner
execline testing I send the whole thing to execlineb -c in order to
guarantee that the shell isn't breaking anything. This matters even more
when you start using stuff that needs blocks.

-- 
Colin Booth
Received on Mon Sep 17 2018 - 04:32:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun May 09 2021 - 19:38:49 UTC