Re: optional -fstack-protector

From: Laurent Bercot <>
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 10:51:11 +0000

>Any chance you'd be willing to accept a patch like this to let the user
>choose an -fstack-protector variant instead of hardcoding no? The
>default behaviour is of course unchanged.

  If you add a -fstack-protector option to CFLAGS, it will override the
default of no. Isn't that enough?

Received on Thu Oct 05 2017 - 10:51:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun May 09 2021 - 19:38:49 UTC